After the Fall: The Future of CRM
By Erika Morphy
CRMDaily.com
November 6, 2001
"Underlying technology must make customer information gathering
a simple process, easily accessible by other vendors."
About six months ago, Denis Pombriant, research director of the
Aberdeen Group, began pondering what would happen to CRM if the
economy tanked.
At first glance, the answered appeared to be not all that earth-shattering.
"The outside economy is one factor that would cause change
in the CRM industry," Pombriant told CRMDaily.com. But only
one. "After approximately ten years of success with this
application, today's CRM industry is fostering change back onto
itself. Companies' successes are leading them to go back to their
vendors and ask, 'What else can you do for me?'"
Pombriant and his colleagues -- Aberdeen analyst Kent Allen and
Harry Watkins, research director of Aberdeen's CRM practice --
began to explore these issues in greater depth. The result is
a 180-plus-page report entitled "What's Next in CRM?"
and set to be released next week.
New Niches, New Companies
Indeed, that is a question most people are asking, especially
now as the economy slows. Retaining clients is always good, no
matter what the economic environment, and is certainly cheaper
than wooing new ones.
In a series of articles that will run over the next few weeks,
CRMDaily will sound out consultants, analysts and vendors for
their take on this issue.
From the beginning of Aberdeen's analysis, Pombriant said, "there
was evidence that there are lots of new niches opening up in the
CRM field -- and new companies opening those niches. We wanted
to explore both."
One interesting conclusion is the role smaller CRM vendors are
expected to play in the development of this industry. "I
don't see the tech leadership coming out of the Oracles of the
world in the future," Watkins said. "I see it coming
from smaller companies."
Relationship Learning
More important is the new role that CRM vendors -- no matter
their size -- and their clients will develop. "It will move
from a transaction-oriented relationship to one that is mutually
beneficial -- where information is freely available," Pombriant
said. He called this a learning relationship, a termed first coined
in the Harvard Business Review.
"In a transaction-oriented relationship, the vendor and
the client do a deal -- the vendor gets paid and the client gets
a widget," Pombriant explained. This relationship made sense
when vendors could control product information in this space,
and hence could control customers.
Those days are over -- and a good thing, too -- and a new dynamic
is being created between vendor and client. Now, both parties
share information and develop an equal relationship, to a point
that whether a transaction takes place or not is almost beside
the point.
Future CRM applications will be developed with these new relationships
in mind, Pombriant said. Underlying technology must make customer
information gathering a simple process, easily accessible by other
vendors.
Modularity
Pombriant also focused on the ever-growing complexity of CRM
systems and their use in companies. To succeed, vendors in this
space will have to build applications on modular architecture,
such as the Java paradigm and Microsoft .NET, he said.
"Using modular architecture will enable vendors to separate
business processes, rules, data and core processing to allow end-users
of these products to effect the kind of rapid change that is required,"
he said.
"Too often, right now, end-users face the choice of having
to adopt best practices that have business methods embedded in
them in order to get an application up and running," Pombriant
said. "We think in doing that they sacrifice their uniqueness
-- a uniqueness that is ultimately better supported by modularity."